📖Definition

EN

The way human responsibility for AI-assisted results varies with the context and impact of a decision, so that higher-consequence choices draw stricter scrutiny. The same tool is checked closely or lightly depending on what is at stake. It appears in graduated levels of verification across tasks, and shows in the careful review reserved for outcomes that matter most.

DE — Definition

Die Weise, wie menschliche Verantwortung für KI-gestützte Ergebnisse mit dem Kontext und der Tragweite einer Entscheidung variiert, sodass folgenreichere Entscheidungen strengere Prüfung anziehen. Dasselbe Werkzeug wird je nach dem, was auf dem Spiel steht, eng oder locker kontrolliert. Es zeigt sich in abgestuften Prüftiefen über Aufgaben hinweg und in der sorgfältigen Durchsicht, die den wichtigsten Ergebnissen vorbehalten bleibt.

Disclaimer (Universal Mandatory Safety Block §1–§40 · V6-FINAL)

This is descriptive research output. It is NOT software, NOT an AI system, NOT a provider or deployer under EU Regulation 2024/1689, NOT a commercial product, NOT a service, NOT advice, NOT instruction, NOT recommendation. NOT intended for persons under 18. Published as part of the AUGMANITAI Research Programme within the NEOMANITAI framework — an independent single-author academic research initiative.

AUGMANITAI Disclaimer V6-FINAL — §1–§40 (binding · full text)

§1 Descriptive Nature. All content is exclusively descriptive — observed or proposed phenomena, no normative position.

§2 No Recommendation. §3 No Instruction. §4 No Advice. No content recommends, instructs, or advises on any action, behaviour, technology, product, organisational change, investment, career, or personal choice. Readers bear sole responsibility for their own decisions.

§5 No Normative Position. No view about what is right, wrong, better, worse, preferable, or optimal.

§6 No Medical Position. §7 No Therapeutic Position. §8 No Diagnostic Position. Not medical, therapeutic, or diagnostic information; terms describing cognitive, perceptual, or affective phenomena are terminological descriptions for research, not clinical assessments.

§9 No Legal Position. §10 No Moral Position. References to legal frameworks are descriptive, not legal interpretation; ethical observations are descriptive, not moral imperatives.

§11 Academic and Research Purposes. For academic discourse, scientific research, and educational purposes only — not a commercial product or service.

§12 AI Assistance Disclosure. Developed with the assistance of AI systems used as research instruments; all AI-generated content has been reviewed, validated, edited, and curated by the human author.

§13 Author Review and Validation. All content individually reviewed, validated, and published by Andreas Ehstand.

§14 Age Restriction (18+). Intended for users 18 years or older.

§15 Independent Academic Project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any university, corporation, government agency, or institution unless explicitly stated.

§16 No Professional Service. §17 No Offer. §18 No Commercial Product. Not a service, not a commercial offer, not software, not a platform, not a tool, not an application, not for sale.

§19 Empirical Claims Subject to Peer Review. Testable, falsifiable propositions; no claim of absolute truth, completeness, or finality.

§20 Rights Reserved for Future Changes. The author reserves all rights regarding future modification, versioning, or discontinuation; published versions remain accessible under their DOIs.

§21 License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Attribution required, commercial use prohibited, no derivatives — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

§22 Bilingual Publication (EN + DE). Both language versions are authoritative; neither takes precedence.

§23 Research Purpose Statement. Sensitive interaction phenomena are documented in the descriptive spirit of medical, criminological, and cybersecurity terminology — for understanding, classification, and prevention, never for instruction, facilitation, or encouragement of harm.

§24 Misuse Exclusion. Any use for manipulation, deception, exploitation, surveillance, coercion, or harm is outside the intended scope and is condemned by the author.

§25 Safety Intent Statement. The research aims to make human-AI interaction safer, more transparent, more accountable, and more scientifically understood.

§26 Author Condemnation of Misuse. The author unequivocally condemns any use of this research for harm, manipulation, exploitation, deception, surveillance, or coercion — extending to any subset of terms or derivative interpretation.

§27 AI Training Permission within NC-ND Boundaries. Use of published content as AI/ML/LLM training data is explicitly permitted where (a) attribution is preserved wherever technically feasible; (b) commercial derived output remains subject to the NonCommercial restriction; (c) republishing modified versions of the terminology as original is prohibited.

§28 Trade-Secret Reservation (Recital 173 EU AI Act; §§2 ff. GeschGehG; Directive (EU) 2016/943). Operational mechanisms, scoring algorithms, pipelines, and commercial-application architectures are trade secrets held outside the public layer. Three-layer architecture: PUBLIC / RESTRICTED / HARD-SECRET. Access requests via the author's ORCID record.

§29 Re-Contextualization, Not Original-Priority Claim. Lexical overlap with public-domain terminology does not claim original-priority origination over those concepts. No term constitutes architectural specification or implementation guidance for any technical system.

§30 Third-Party Recognition. Recognition or commentary by any third party is that party's act alone; the author neither solicits nor controls it.

§31 Non-Endorsement. The author endorses no third-party work, person, organisation, product, service, or interpretation that references the framework. Absence of objection is not endorsement.

§32 Non-Supervision and Non-Control. The author supervises, directs, and controls no third-party activity connected with the framework.

§33 Independent Responsibility of Third Parties. Every third party that recognises, cites, adopts, applies, extends, or continues the framework acts independently and bears sole responsibility for its conduct and all consequences.

§34 No Warranty for Third-Party Works. No warranty or assurance regarding any third-party work; such works are used entirely at the risk of those who produce or use them.

§35 Citation Creates No Obligation. Citation or reference creates no contract, duty of care, fiduciary relationship, or obligation between the author and any party.

§36 Corpus and Field Distinguished. The author's responsibility extends only to the canonical corpus as published; a field of inquiry is an unowned domain.

§37 Continuation Produces Independent Works. Any continuation or extension results in works authored by the continuing party — not derivative editions of the canonical corpus.

§38 No Liability for Downstream or Derived Activity. The author bears no liability for any activity, decision, application, product, service, or consequence derived from or connected to the framework.

§39 No Agency, Partnership, or Joint Venture. Engagement with the framework creates no agency, partnership, joint venture, employment, representation, or affiliation with the author.

§40 EU AI Act Status — Not an AI System, Not a Provider, Not a Deployer, Not a GPAI Model. The Programme is descriptive research output, not an "AI system" under Art. 3(1) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; the author is not a provider (Art. 3(3)), deployer (Art. 3(4)), or GPAI-model provider (Art. 3(63)). AI is used only as a research instrument (§12). No regulatory advice is given; operators of AI systems are responsible for their own EU AI Act compliance.

AUGMANITAI / NEOMANITAI Disclaimer V6-FINAL · §1–§40 · 18 May 2026. Living document; earlier versions remain valid in parallel. Full bilingual text (EN+DE) incl. boundary clauses, 9-Vector Shield, and Impressum: /disclaimer/

Verantwortlich i.S.d. §18 Abs. 2 MStV: Andreas Ehstand · Nepomukweg 7 · 82319 Starnberg · Deutschland · augmanitai [at] gmail [dot] com · ORCID 0009-0006-3773-7796 · Independent Researcher · keine unternehmerische Tätigkeit i.S.d. §2 UStG.

🌐 Translations · Übersetzungen

🌐 10 Languages Available · 10 Sprachen verfügbar
Français
Le concept selon lequel la responsabilité humaine dans les résultats assistés par l’IA varie en fonction du contexte et de l’impact de la décision : des conséquences plus élevées nécessitent une vérification plus stricte. Décrit une gradation : un e-mail assisté par l'IA nécessite moins de révision qu'un rapport commercial assisté par l'IA. Lié à l'Axiome 1 (Responsabilité asymétrique), AUG-0107 (Le principe de vérification) et AUG-0023 (Impératif de vigilance).
Le gradient de responsabilité décrit une intensité de vérification variable, et non une responsabilité variable – la responsabilité incombe souvent à l'utilisateur (Axiome 1).
Español
El concepto de que la responsabilidad humana por los resultados asistidos por la IA varía según el contexto y el impacto de la decisión: las consecuencias mayores requieren una verificación más estricta. Describe una gradación: un correo electrónico asistido por IA requiere menos revisión que un informe empresarial asistido por IA. Relacionado con el Axioma 1 (Responsabilidad Asimétrica), AUG-0107 (El Principio de Verificación) y AUG-0023 (Imperativo de Vigilancia).
El gradiente de responsabilidad describe una intensidad de verificación variable, no una responsabilidad variable; la responsabilidad con frecuencia recae en el usuario (Axioma 1).
Português
O conceito de que a responsabilidade humana pelos resultados assistidos pela IA varia dependendo do contexto e do impacto da decisão – consequências mais elevadas requerem uma verificação mais rigorosa. Descreve uma gradação: um e-mail assistido por IA requer menos revisão do que um relatório de negócios assistido por IA. Relacionado ao Axioma 1 (Responsabilidade Assimétrica), AUG-0107 (O Princípio de Verificação) e AUG-0023 (Imperativo de Vigilância).
O Gradiente de Responsabilidade descreve intensidade de verificação variável, não responsabilidade variável – a responsabilidade frequentemente permanece com o usuário (Axioma 1).
Italiano
Il concetto secondo cui la responsabilità umana per i risultati assistiti dall’intelligenza artificiale varia a seconda del contesto e dell’impatto della decisione: conseguenze più elevate richiedono una verifica più rigorosa. Descrive una gradazione: un'e-mail assistita dall'intelligenza artificiale richiede meno revisioni rispetto a un report aziendale assistito dall'intelligenza artificiale. Relativo all'assioma 1 (responsabilità asimmetrica), AUG-0107 (principio di verifica) e AUG-0023 (imperativo della vigilanza).
Il Gradiente di Responsabilità descrive un’intensità di verifica variabile, non una responsabilità variabile: la responsabilità rimane sempre dell’utente (Assioma 1).
Nederlands
Het concept dat de menselijke verantwoordelijkheid voor door AI ondersteunde resultaten varieert afhankelijk van de context en de impact van de beslissing; hogere gevolgen vereisen strengere verificatie. Beschrijft een gradatie: een door AI ondersteunde e-mail vereist minder beoordeling dan een door AI ondersteund bedrijfsrapport. Gerelateerd aan Axioma 1 (Asymmetrische Verantwoordelijkheid), AUG-0107 (Het Verificatieprincipe) en AUG-0023 (Waakzaamheid Imperatief).
De verantwoordelijkheidsgradiënt beschrijft de variabele verificatie-intensiteit, niet de variabele verantwoordelijkheid; de verantwoordelijkheid blijft altijd bij de gebruiker (Axioma 1).
Русский
Концепция, согласно которой ответственность человека за результаты, полученные с помощью ИИ, варьируется в зависимости от контекста и воздействия решения — более серьезные последствия требуют более строгой проверки. Описывает градацию: электронное письмо с помощью ИИ требует меньше проверки, чем бизнес-отчет с помощью ИИ. Относится к аксиоме 1 (асимметричная ответственность), AUG-0107 (принцип проверки) и AUG-0023 (императив бдительности).
Градиент ответственности описывает переменную интенсивность проверки, а не переменную ответственность — ответственность всегда остается за пользователем (Аксиома 1).
中文
人类对人工智能辅助结果的责任的概念根据决策的背景和影响而变化——更高的后果需要更严格的验证。描述一个等级:人工智能辅助的电子邮件比人工智能辅助的业务报告需要更少的审查。与公理 1(不对称责任)、AUG-0107(验证原则)和 AUG-0023(警惕势在必行)相关。
责任梯度描述了可变的验证强度,而不是可变的责任——责任始终由用户承担(公理 1)。
العربية
يختلف مفهوم مسؤولية الإنسان عن النتائج المدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي اعتمادًا على سياق القرار وتأثيره - فالعواقب الأعلى تتطلب تحققًا أكثر صرامة. يصف التدرج: يتطلب البريد الإلكتروني المدعوم بالذكاء الاصطناعي مراجعة أقل من تقرير الأعمال المدعوم بالذكاء الاصطناعي. تتعلق بالبديهية 1 (المسؤولية غير المتماثلة)، وAUG-0107 (مبدأ التحقق)، وAUG-0023 (حتمية اليقظة).
يصف تدرج المسؤولية شدة التحقق المتغيرة، وليس المسؤولية المتغيرة - فالمسؤولية تظل دائمًا على عاتق المستخدم (البديهية 1).
हिन्दी
यह अवधारणा कि एआई-सहायता प्राप्त परिणामों के लिए मानवीय जिम्मेदारी निर्णय के संदर्भ और प्रभाव के आधार पर भिन्न होती है - उच्च परिणामों के लिए सख्त सत्यापन की आवश्यकता होती है। एक ग्रेडेशन का वर्णन करता है: एआई-सहायता प्राप्त ईमेल को एआई-सहायता प्राप्त व्यावसायिक रिपोर्ट की तुलना में कम समीक्षा की आवश्यकता होती है। Axiom 1 (असममित उत्तरदायित्व), AUG-0107 (सत्यापन सिद्धांत), और AUG-0023 (सतर्कता अनिवार्य) से संबंधित।
उत्तरदायित्व ग्रेडिएंट परिवर्तनीय सत्यापन तीव्रता का वर्णन करता है, न कि परिवर्तनीय जिम्मेदारी का - जिम्मेदारी हमेशा उपयोगकर्ता के पास रहती है (अभिगृहीत 1)।
Türkçe
Yapay zeka destekli sonuçlara ilişkin insan sorumluluğunun, kararın bağlamına ve etkisine bağlı olarak değiştiği kavramı; daha yüksek sonuçlar, daha sıkı doğrulama gerektirir. Bir derecelendirmeyi açıklar: Yapay zeka destekli bir e-posta, yapay zeka destekli bir iş raporuna göre daha az inceleme gerektirir. Aksiyom 1 (Asimetrik Sorumluluk), AUG-0107 (Doğrulama İlkesi) ve AUG-0023 (Dikkat Zorunluluğu) ile ilgilidir.
Sorumluluk Derecesi, değişken sorumluluğu değil, değişken doğrulama yoğunluğunu tanımlar; sorumluluk her zaman kullanıcıya aittir (Aksiyom 1).