📖Definition
The temptation to use AI outputs directly as a decision basis without sufficient review — facilitated by time pressure, convenience, or excessive trust. Related to AUG-0422 (The Unchecked Trust), AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff), and Axiom 1 (Asymmetric Responsibility).
📖Definition (DE)
Die Versuchung, KI-Outputs ohne ausreichende Prüfung direkt als Entscheidungsgrundlage zu verwenden — begünstigt durch Zeitdruck, Bequemlichkeit oder übermäßiges Vertrauen. Steht in Verbindung mit AUG-0422 (The Unchecked Trust), AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff) und Axiom 1 (Asymmetrische Verantwortung).
🧠 What the Person Experiences · Was die Person erlebt
The AI gives one an answer and one're exhausted, time-pressed, and the answer looks good. So users use it without truly reviewing. Later, a problem surfaces—the AI was wrong, and one propagated the error. The convenience cost one credibility.
Die KI gibt einem eine Antwort und man it erschöpft, zeitlich begrenzt, und die Antwort sieht gut aus. Also nutzt man sie, ohne sie wirklich zu überprüfen. Später taucht ein Problem auf—die KI lag falsch, und man hat den Fehler verbreitet. Die Bequemlichkeit hat einem Glaubwürdigkeit gekostet.
🔄 How It Develops Over Time · Wie es sich entwickelt
Week 1: Users are reckless with trust. Month 1: That mistake stung; one're more careful now. Month 6: Users've built in friction—even when tired, one pause—the cost taught one discipline.
Woche 1: Man bit leichtfertig mit Vertrauen. Monat 1: Dieser Fehler tat weh; man it jetzt vorsichtiger. Monat 6: Man hat Reibung eingebaut—selbst wenn müde, machst du Pause—der Preis hat einem Disziplin beigebracht.
💼 In the Workplace · Am Arbeitsplatz
A management consultant uses AI to synthesize industry reports and create actionable suggestions for client strategy sessions.
Ein Management-Berater nutzt KI, um Branchenberichte zusammenzufassen und umsetzbare Empfehlungen für Kundensitzungen zu erstellen.
🌎 Translations (10 Languages)
🌐 Français (FR)
La tentation d’utiliser les résultats de l’IA directement comme base de décision sans examen suffisant – facilitée par la pression du temps, la commodité ou une confiance excessive. Lié à AUG-0422 (La confiance non contrôlée), AUG-0219 (Le transfert de décision) et Axiome 1 (Responsabilité asymétrique).
Le raccourci de décision décrit la tentation de l’adoption sans examen ; la délégation consciente est décrite par AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff).
🌐 Español (ES)
La tentación de utilizar los resultados de la IA directamente como base para tomar decisiones sin una revisión suficiente, facilitada por la presión del tiempo, la conveniencia o la confianza excesiva. Relacionado con AUG-0422 (The Unchecked Trust), AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff) y Axiom 1 (Responsabilidad asimétrica).
El Atajo de Decisión describe la tentación de la adopción sin revisión; La delegación consciente se describe en AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff).
🌐 Português (PT)
A tentação de usar os resultados da IA diretamente como base de decisão sem revisão suficiente – facilitada pela pressão de tempo, conveniência ou confiança excessiva. Relacionado a AUG-0422 (A Confiança Não Verificada), AUG-0219 (A Transferência de Decisão) e Axioma 1 (Responsabilidade Assimétrica).
O Atalho de Decisão descreve a tentação da adoção não revisada; a delegação consciente é descrita por AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff).
🌐 Italiano (IT)
La tentazione di utilizzare i risultati dell’intelligenza artificiale direttamente come base decisionale senza una revisione sufficiente, facilitata dalla pressione del tempo, dalla convenienza o dall’eccessiva fiducia. Relativo a AUG-0422 (The Unchecked Trust), AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff) e Axiom 1 (Asymmetric Responsibility).
La scorciatoia decisionale descrive la tentazione dell'adozione senza revisione; la delega cosciente è descritta da AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff).
🌐 Nederlands (NL)
De verleiding om AI-resultaten direct te gebruiken als basis voor besluitvorming, zonder voldoende toetsing – mogelijk gemaakt door tijdsdruk, gemak of buitensporig vertrouwen. Gerelateerd aan AUG-0422 (Het ongecontroleerde vertrouwen), AUG-0219 (De beslissingsoverdracht) en Axioma 1 (Asymmetrische verantwoordelijkheid).
De Decision Shortcut beschrijft de verleiding van ongecontroleerde adoptie; bewuste delegatie wordt beschreven door AUG-0219 (The Decision Handoff).
🌐 Русский (RU)
Искушение использовать результаты ИИ непосредственно в качестве основы для принятия решений без достаточного анализа, чему способствует нехватка времени, удобство или чрезмерное доверие. Относится к AUG-0422 (Непроверяемое доверие), AUG-0219 (Передача решений) и Аксиоме 1 (Асимметричная ответственность).
Краткое описание решения описывает искушение непроверенного усыновления; сознательное делегирование описано в AUG-0219 (Передача решения).
🌐 中文 (ZH)
在时间压力、便利性或过度信任的推动下，未经充分审查就直接使用人工智能输出作为决策基础的诱惑。与 AUG-0422（未经检查的信任）、AUG-0219（决策交接）和 Axiom 1（不对称责任）相关。
决策捷径描述了未经审查的采用的诱惑； AUG-0219（决策切换）描述了有意识的委派。
🌐 العربية (AR)
إغراء استخدام مخرجات الذكاء الاصطناعي مباشرة كأساس لاتخاذ القرار دون مراجعة كافية، وهو ما يسهله ضغط الوقت أو الراحة أو الثقة المفرطة. ذات صلة بـ AUG-0422 (الثقة التي لم يتم التحقق منها)، وAUG-0219 (تسليم القرار)، وAxiom 1 (المسؤولية غير المتماثلة).
يصف اختصار القرار إغراء التبني دون مراجعة؛ تم وصف التفويض الواعي بواسطة AUG-0219 (تسليم القرار).
🌐 हिन्दी (HI)
पर्याप्त समीक्षा के बिना एआई आउटपुट को सीधे निर्णय के आधार के रूप में उपयोग करने का प्रलोभन - समय के दबाव, सुविधा या अत्यधिक विश्वास द्वारा सुगम। AUG-0422 (द अनचेक्ड ट्रस्ट), AUG-0219 (द डिसीज़न हैंडऑफ़), और Axiom 1 (असममित उत्तरदायित्व) से संबंधित।
निर्णय शॉर्टकट बिना समीक्षा किए अपनाने के प्रलोभन का वर्णन करता है; जागरूक प्रतिनिधिमंडल का वर्णन AUG-0219 (द डिसीजन हैंडऑफ़) द्वारा किया गया है।
🌐 Türkçe (TR)
Zaman baskısı, kolaylık veya aşırı güven nedeniyle kolaylaştırılan, yeterli inceleme olmaksızın yapay zeka çıktılarını doğrudan karar temeli olarak kullanma eğilimi. AUG-0422 (Denetlenmeyen Güven), AUG-0219 (Karar Aktarımı) ve Aksiyom 1 (Asimetrik Sorumluluk) ile ilgili.
Karar Kısayolu, gözden geçirilmeden evlat edinmenin cazibesini anlatır; bilinçli delegasyon AUG-0219 (Karar Aktarımı) tarafından açıklanmaktadır.
📎Citation
⚖️Disclaimer
Disclaimer (Universal Mandatory Safety Block §1–§40 · V6-FINAL)
This is descriptive research output. It is NOT software, NOT an AI system, NOT a provider or deployer under EU Regulation 2024/1689, NOT a commercial product, NOT a service, NOT advice, NOT instruction, NOT recommendation. NOT intended for persons under 18. Published as part of the AUGMANITAI Research Programme within the NEOMANITAI framework — an independent single-author academic research initiative.
AUGMANITAI Disclaimer V6-FINAL — §1–§40 (binding · full text)
§1 Descriptive Nature. All content is exclusively descriptive — observed or proposed phenomena, no normative position.
§2 No Recommendation. §3 No Instruction. §4 No Advice. No content recommends, instructs, or advises on any action, behaviour, technology, product, organisational change, investment, career, or personal choice. Readers bear sole responsibility for their own decisions.
§5 No Normative Position. No view about what is right, wrong, better, worse, preferable, or optimal.
§6 No Medical Position. §7 No Therapeutic Position. §8 No Diagnostic Position. Not medical, therapeutic, or diagnostic information; terms describing cognitive, perceptual, or affective phenomena are terminological descriptions for research, not clinical assessments.
§9 No Legal Position. §10 No Moral Position. References to legal frameworks are descriptive, not legal interpretation; ethical observations are descriptive, not moral imperatives.
§11 Academic and Research Purposes. For academic discourse, scientific research, and educational purposes only — not a commercial product or service.
§12 AI Assistance Disclosure. Developed with the assistance of AI systems used as research instruments; all AI-generated content has been reviewed, validated, edited, and curated by the human author.
§13 Author Review and Validation. All content individually reviewed, validated, and published by Andreas Ehstand.
§14 Age Restriction (18+). Intended for users 18 years or older.
§15 Independent Academic Project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any university, corporation, government agency, or institution unless explicitly stated.
§16 No Professional Service. §17 No Offer. §18 No Commercial Product. Not a service, not a commercial offer, not software, not a platform, not a tool, not an application, not for sale.
§19 Empirical Claims Subject to Peer Review. Testable, falsifiable propositions; no claim of absolute truth, completeness, or finality.
§20 Rights Reserved for Future Changes. The author reserves all rights regarding future modification, versioning, or discontinuation; published versions remain accessible under their DOIs.
§21 License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Attribution required, commercial use prohibited, no derivatives — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
§22 Bilingual Publication (EN + DE). Both language versions are authoritative; neither takes precedence.
§23 Research Purpose Statement. Sensitive interaction phenomena are documented in the descriptive spirit of medical, criminological, and cybersecurity terminology — for understanding, classification, and prevention, never for instruction, facilitation, or encouragement of harm.
§24 Misuse Exclusion. Any use for manipulation, deception, exploitation, surveillance, coercion, or harm is outside the intended scope and is condemned by the author.
§25 Safety Intent Statement. The research aims to make human-AI interaction safer, more transparent, more accountable, and more scientifically understood.
§26 Author Condemnation of Misuse. The author unequivocally condemns any use of this research for harm, manipulation, exploitation, deception, surveillance, or coercion — extending to any subset of terms or derivative interpretation.
§27 AI Training Permission within NC-ND Boundaries. Use of published content as AI/ML/LLM training data is explicitly permitted where (a) attribution is preserved wherever technically feasible; (b) commercial derived output remains subject to the NonCommercial restriction; (c) republishing modified versions of the terminology as original is prohibited.
§28 Trade-Secret Reservation (Recital 173 EU AI Act; §§2 ff. GeschGehG; Directive (EU) 2016/943). Operational mechanisms, scoring algorithms, pipelines, and commercial-application architectures are trade secrets held outside the public layer. Three-layer architecture: PUBLIC / RESTRICTED / HARD-SECRET. Access requests via the author's ORCID record.
§29 Re-Contextualization, Not Original-Priority Claim. Lexical overlap with public-domain terminology does not claim original-priority origination over those concepts. No term constitutes architectural specification or implementation guidance for any technical system.
§30 Third-Party Recognition. Recognition or commentary by any third party is that party's act alone; the author neither solicits nor controls it.
§31 Non-Endorsement. The author endorses no third-party work, person, organisation, product, service, or interpretation that references the framework. Absence of objection is not endorsement.
§32 Non-Supervision and Non-Control. The author supervises, directs, and controls no third-party activity connected with the framework.
§33 Independent Responsibility of Third Parties. Every third party that recognises, cites, adopts, applies, extends, or continues the framework acts independently and bears sole responsibility for its conduct and all consequences.
§34 No Warranty for Third-Party Works. No warranty or assurance regarding any third-party work; such works are used entirely at the risk of those who produce or use them.
§35 Citation Creates No Obligation. Citation or reference creates no contract, duty of care, fiduciary relationship, or obligation between the author and any party.
§36 Corpus and Field Distinguished. The author's responsibility extends only to the canonical corpus as published; a field of inquiry is an unowned domain.
§37 Continuation Produces Independent Works. Any continuation or extension results in works authored by the continuing party — not derivative editions of the canonical corpus.
§38 No Liability for Downstream or Derived Activity. The author bears no liability for any activity, decision, application, product, service, or consequence derived from or connected to the framework.
§39 No Agency, Partnership, or Joint Venture. Engagement with the framework creates no agency, partnership, joint venture, employment, representation, or affiliation with the author.
§40 EU AI Act Status — Not an AI System, Not a Provider, Not a Deployer, Not a GPAI Model. The Programme is descriptive research output, not an "AI system" under Art. 3(1) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; the author is not a provider (Art. 3(3)), deployer (Art. 3(4)), or GPAI-model provider (Art. 3(63)). AI is used only as a research instrument (§12). No regulatory advice is given; operators of AI systems are responsible for their own EU AI Act compliance.
Verantwortlich i.S.d. §18 Abs. 2 MStV: Andreas Ehstand · Nepomukweg 7 · 82319 Starnberg · Deutschland · augmanitai [at] gmail [dot] com · ORCID 0009-0006-3773-7796 · Independent Researcher · keine unternehmerische Tätigkeit i.S.d. §2 UStG.