📖Definition
The conscious decision to leave a linguistic error, irregularity, or personal idiosyncrasy in an AI-edited text — to preserve the human handwriting. Related to Axiom 12 (Version Truth), AUG-0179 (The Ownership Check), and AUG-0263 (The Ownership Boost).
📖Definition (DE)
Die bewusste Entscheidung, einen sprachlichen Fehler, eine Unregelmäßigkeit oder eine persönliche Eigenheit in einem KI-bearbeiteten Text stehen zu lassen — um die menschliche Handschrift zu bewahren. Steht in Verbindung mit Axiom 12 (Versionswahrheit), AUG-0179 (The Ownership Check) und AUG-0263 (The Ownership Boost).
🧠 What the Person Experiences · Was die Person erlebt
The AI smoothed out the phrasing, made it perfect. But one decided to leave the typo, the awkward construction, the thing that's unmistakably one. The document is less polished, but it's more real. The handwriting shows through.
Die KI polierte die eigene Phrasing auf, machte es perfekt. Aber man beschlosst, den Tippfehler zu behalten, das unbeholfene Konstrukt, das unverkennbar das eigene ist. Das Dokument ist weniger poliert, aber es ist realer. Die eigene Handschrift scheint durch.
🔄 How It Develops Over Time · Wie es sich entwickelt
Week 1: Users accept the AI's improvements, erase the style. Month 1: Users start resisting some changes, keeping the quirks. Month 6: The final version blends AI polish with deliberate human roughness.
Woche 1: Man akzeptiert die Verbesserungen der KI, löschst den eigenen Stil. Monat 1: Man fängt an, sich gegen manche Änderungen zu wehren, behältst die eigene Eigenheiten. Monat 6: Die endgültige Version vermischt KI-Glanz mit bewusstem menschlichen Rauheit.
💼 In the Workplace · Am Arbeitsplatz
A product manager uses AI to synthesize user feedback, analyze feature requests, and prioritize development sprints.
Ein Produktmanager nutzt KI, um Nutzerfeedback zusammenzufassen, Feature-Anforderungen zu analysieren und Entwicklungssprints zu priorisieren.
🌎 Translations (10 Languages)
🌐 Français (FR)
La décision consciente de laisser une erreur linguistique, une irrégularité ou une idiosyncrasie personnelle dans un texte édité par l’IA – pour préserver l’écriture humaine. Lié à Axiom 12 (Version Truth), AUG-0179 (The Ownership Check) et AUG-0263 (The Ownership Boost).
The Kept Typo décrit la rétention consciente d’une idiosyncrasie ; les erreurs accidentelles ne relèvent pas de ce terme.
🌐 Español (ES)
La decisión consciente de dejar un error lingüístico, una irregularidad o una idiosincrasia personal en un texto editado por IA para preservar la escritura humana. Relacionado con Axiom 12 (Verdad de la versión), AUG-0179 (La verificación de propiedad) y AUG-0263 (El impulso de propiedad).
The Kept Typo describe la retención consciente de una idiosincrasia; Los errores accidentales no entran dentro de este término.
🌐 Português (PT)
A decisão consciente de deixar um erro linguístico, irregularidade ou idiossincrasia pessoal num texto editado por IA — para preservar a caligrafia humana. Relacionado ao Axiom 12 (Verdade da Versão), AUG-0179 (A Verificação de Propriedade) e AUG-0263 (O Aumento de Propriedade).
The Kept Typo descreve a retenção consciente de uma idiossincrasia; erros acidentais não se enquadram neste termo.
🌐 Italiano (IT)
La decisione consapevole di lasciare un errore linguistico, un’irregolarità o una idiosincrasia personale in un testo modificato dall’intelligenza artificiale – per preservare la calligrafia umana. Relativo a Axiom 12 (Version Truth), AUG-0179 (The Ownership Check) e AUG-0263 (The Ownership Boost).
Il Typo Kept descrive il mantenimento cosciente di un'idiosincrasia; gli errori accidentali non rientrano in questo termine.
🌐 Nederlands (NL)
De bewuste beslissing om een taalfout, onregelmatigheid of persoonlijke eigenaardigheid in een door AI bewerkte tekst achter te laten – om het menselijke handschrift te behouden. Gerelateerd aan Axioma 12 (Versiewaarheid), AUG-0179 (De eigendomscontrole) en AUG-0263 (De eigendomsboost).
The Kept Typo beschrijft het bewust vasthouden van een eigenaardigheid; toevallige fouten vallen niet onder deze term.
🌐 Русский (RU)
Сознательное решение оставить лингвистическую ошибку, неточность или личную особенность в тексте, отредактированном ИИ, — чтобы сохранить человеческий почерк. Относится к Аксиоме 12 (Истина версии), AUG-0179 (Проверка владения) и AUG-0263 (Повышение владения).
«Сохраняемая опечатка» описывает сознательное сохранение идиосинкразии; случайные ошибки не подпадают под этот термин.
🌐 中文 (ZH)
有意识地决定在人工智能编辑的文本中留下语言错误、不规则或个人特质——以保留人类的笔迹。与 Axiom 12（版本真相）、AUG-0179（所有权检查）和 AUG-0263（所有权提升）相关。
保留的打字错误描述了有意识地保留某种特质；意外错误不属于本术语范围。
🌐 العربية (AR)
القرار الواعي بترك خطأ لغوي، أو عدم انتظام، أو خصوصيات شخصية في نص تم تحريره بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي - للحفاظ على خط اليد البشري. ذات صلة بـ Axiom 12 (نسخة الحقيقة)، وAUG-0179 (التحقق من الملكية)، وAUG-0263 (تعزيز الملكية).
يصف الخطأ المطبعي المحتفظ به الاحتفاظ الواعي بالخصوصية؛ الأخطاء العرضية لا تندرج تحت هذا المصطلح.
🌐 हिन्दी (HI)
एआई-संपादित पाठ में भाषाई त्रुटि, अनियमितता, या व्यक्तिगत विशिष्टता को छोड़ने का सचेत निर्णय - मानव लिखावट को संरक्षित करने के लिए। Axiom 12 (संस्करण सत्य), AUG-0179 (स्वामित्व जांच), और AUG-0263 (स्वामित्व बूस्ट) से संबंधित।
केप्ट टाइपो एक विलक्षणता की सचेतन अवधारण का वर्णन करता है; आकस्मिक त्रुटियाँ इस शब्द के अंतर्गत नहीं आतीं।
🌐 Türkçe (TR)
İnsan el yazısını korumak için yapay zeka tarafından düzenlenen bir metinde dilsel bir hata, düzensizlik veya kişisel özellikler bırakmaya yönelik bilinçli karar. Axiom 12 (Sürüm Gerçeği), AUG-0179 (Sahiplik Kontrolü) ve AUG-0263 (Sahiplik Artışı) ile ilgili.
Tutulan Yazım Hatası, bir özel durumun bilinçli olarak muhafaza edilmesini anlatır; tesadüfi hatalar bu terimin kapsamına girmez.
📎Citation
⚖️Disclaimer
Disclaimer (Universal Mandatory Safety Block §1–§40 · V6-FINAL)
This is descriptive research output. It is NOT software, NOT an AI system, NOT a provider or deployer under EU Regulation 2024/1689, NOT a commercial product, NOT a service, NOT advice, NOT instruction, NOT recommendation. NOT intended for persons under 18. Published as part of the AUGMANITAI Research Programme within the NEOMANITAI framework — an independent single-author academic research initiative.
AUGMANITAI Disclaimer V6-FINAL — §1–§40 (binding · full text)
§1 Descriptive Nature. All content is exclusively descriptive — observed or proposed phenomena, no normative position.
§2 No Recommendation. §3 No Instruction. §4 No Advice. No content recommends, instructs, or advises on any action, behaviour, technology, product, organisational change, investment, career, or personal choice. Readers bear sole responsibility for their own decisions.
§5 No Normative Position. No view about what is right, wrong, better, worse, preferable, or optimal.
§6 No Medical Position. §7 No Therapeutic Position. §8 No Diagnostic Position. Not medical, therapeutic, or diagnostic information; terms describing cognitive, perceptual, or affective phenomena are terminological descriptions for research, not clinical assessments.
§9 No Legal Position. §10 No Moral Position. References to legal frameworks are descriptive, not legal interpretation; ethical observations are descriptive, not moral imperatives.
§11 Academic and Research Purposes. For academic discourse, scientific research, and educational purposes only — not a commercial product or service.
§12 AI Assistance Disclosure. Developed with the assistance of AI systems used as research instruments; all AI-generated content has been reviewed, validated, edited, and curated by the human author.
§13 Author Review and Validation. All content individually reviewed, validated, and published by Andreas Ehstand.
§14 Age Restriction (18+). Intended for users 18 years or older.
§15 Independent Academic Project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any university, corporation, government agency, or institution unless explicitly stated.
§16 No Professional Service. §17 No Offer. §18 No Commercial Product. Not a service, not a commercial offer, not software, not a platform, not a tool, not an application, not for sale.
§19 Empirical Claims Subject to Peer Review. Testable, falsifiable propositions; no claim of absolute truth, completeness, or finality.
§20 Rights Reserved for Future Changes. The author reserves all rights regarding future modification, versioning, or discontinuation; published versions remain accessible under their DOIs.
§21 License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Attribution required, commercial use prohibited, no derivatives — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
§22 Bilingual Publication (EN + DE). Both language versions are authoritative; neither takes precedence.
§23 Research Purpose Statement. Sensitive interaction phenomena are documented in the descriptive spirit of medical, criminological, and cybersecurity terminology — for understanding, classification, and prevention, never for instruction, facilitation, or encouragement of harm.
§24 Misuse Exclusion. Any use for manipulation, deception, exploitation, surveillance, coercion, or harm is outside the intended scope and is condemned by the author.
§25 Safety Intent Statement. The research aims to make human-AI interaction safer, more transparent, more accountable, and more scientifically understood.
§26 Author Condemnation of Misuse. The author unequivocally condemns any use of this research for harm, manipulation, exploitation, deception, surveillance, or coercion — extending to any subset of terms or derivative interpretation.
§27 AI Training Permission within NC-ND Boundaries. Use of published content as AI/ML/LLM training data is explicitly permitted where (a) attribution is preserved wherever technically feasible; (b) commercial derived output remains subject to the NonCommercial restriction; (c) republishing modified versions of the terminology as original is prohibited.
§28 Trade-Secret Reservation (Recital 173 EU AI Act; §§2 ff. GeschGehG; Directive (EU) 2016/943). Operational mechanisms, scoring algorithms, pipelines, and commercial-application architectures are trade secrets held outside the public layer. Three-layer architecture: PUBLIC / RESTRICTED / HARD-SECRET. Access requests via the author's ORCID record.
§29 Re-Contextualization, Not Original-Priority Claim. Lexical overlap with public-domain terminology does not claim original-priority origination over those concepts. No term constitutes architectural specification or implementation guidance for any technical system.
§30 Third-Party Recognition. Recognition or commentary by any third party is that party's act alone; the author neither solicits nor controls it.
§31 Non-Endorsement. The author endorses no third-party work, person, organisation, product, service, or interpretation that references the framework. Absence of objection is not endorsement.
§32 Non-Supervision and Non-Control. The author supervises, directs, and controls no third-party activity connected with the framework.
§33 Independent Responsibility of Third Parties. Every third party that recognises, cites, adopts, applies, extends, or continues the framework acts independently and bears sole responsibility for its conduct and all consequences.
§34 No Warranty for Third-Party Works. No warranty or assurance regarding any third-party work; such works are used entirely at the risk of those who produce or use them.
§35 Citation Creates No Obligation. Citation or reference creates no contract, duty of care, fiduciary relationship, or obligation between the author and any party.
§36 Corpus and Field Distinguished. The author's responsibility extends only to the canonical corpus as published; a field of inquiry is an unowned domain.
§37 Continuation Produces Independent Works. Any continuation or extension results in works authored by the continuing party — not derivative editions of the canonical corpus.
§38 No Liability for Downstream or Derived Activity. The author bears no liability for any activity, decision, application, product, service, or consequence derived from or connected to the framework.
§39 No Agency, Partnership, or Joint Venture. Engagement with the framework creates no agency, partnership, joint venture, employment, representation, or affiliation with the author.
§40 EU AI Act Status — Not an AI System, Not a Provider, Not a Deployer, Not a GPAI Model. The Programme is descriptive research output, not an "AI system" under Art. 3(1) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; the author is not a provider (Art. 3(3)), deployer (Art. 3(4)), or GPAI-model provider (Art. 3(63)). AI is used only as a research instrument (§12). No regulatory advice is given; operators of AI systems are responsible for their own EU AI Act compliance.
Verantwortlich i.S.d. §18 Abs. 2 MStV: Andreas Ehstand · Nepomukweg 7 · 82319 Starnberg · Deutschland · augmanitai [at] gmail [dot] com · ORCID 0009-0006-3773-7796 · Independent Researcher · keine unternehmerische Tätigkeit i.S.d. §2 UStG.