📖Definition
The periodic review of what personal data, contexts, and habits a user has shared with an AI over time — and whether this degree of openness remains appropriate. Related to Axiom 16 (Data Awareness), AUG-0222 (The Oversharing Drift), and AUG-0140 (The Weekly Status).
📖Definition (DE)
Die periodische Überprüfung, welche persönlichen Daten, Kontexte und Gewohnheiten ein Nutzer über die Zeit mit einer KI geteilt hat — und ob dieses Maß an Offenheit weiterhin angemessen ist. Steht in Verbindung mit Axiom 16 (Datenbewusstheit), AUG-0222 (The Oversharing Drift) und AUG-0140 (The Weekly Status).
🧠 What the Person Experiences · Was die Person erlebt
Users are going through the AI conversations and realizing how much one has shared. Personal problems, financial details, family drama. The AI has more intimate knowledge of one than most people do. The thought is uncomfortable. Users are exposed.
Man geht durch die eigene KI-Gespräche und merkst, wie viel man geteilt hast. Persönliche Probleme, finanzielle Details, Familiendrama. Die KI kennt sich intimer als die meisten Menschen. Der Gedanke ist unbequem. Man bit exponiert.
🔄 How It Develops Over Time · Wie es sich entwickelt
Week 1: Users share freely, don't think about it. Month 1: Users realize how much one has disclosed, start being more careful. Month 6: Users have clear boundaries, one share authentically but strategically.
Woche 1: Man teilt frei, denkst nicht darüber nach. Monat 1: Man merkt, wie viel man offengelegte hast, fängst an, vorsichtiger zu sein. Monat 6: Man hat klare Grenzen, teilst authentisch, aber strategisch.
💼 In the Workplace · Am Arbeitsplatz
A UX designer collaborates with AI to brainstorm layout variations and get instant feedback on accessibility compliance.
Ein UX-Designer arbeitet mit KI zusammen, um Layout-Variationen zu entwerfen und sofortiges Feedback zur Barrierefreiheit zu erhalten.
🌎 Translations (10 Languages)
🌐 Français (FR)
L’examen périodique des données personnelles, des contextes et des habitudes qu’un utilisateur a partagés avec une IA au fil du temps – et si ce degré d’ouverture reste approprié. Lié à l'Axiome 16 (Conscience des données), AUG-0222 (La dérive du partage) et AUG-0140 (Le statut hebdomadaire).
Le contrôle d'accès complet décrit l'auto-évaluation de l'utilisateur concernant les données partagées ; la question technique de la protection des données ne relève pas de ce terme.
🌐 Español (ES)
La revisión periódica de qué datos personales, contextos y hábitos ha compartido un usuario con una IA a lo largo del tiempo, y si este grado de apertura sigue siendo apropiado. Relacionado con el Axioma 16 (Conciencia de datos), AUG-0222 (La deriva del intercambio excesivo) y AUG-0140 (El estado semanal).
La verificación de acceso completo describe la autoevaluación del usuario con respecto a los datos compartidos; la cuestión de la protección de datos técnicos no entra dentro de este término.
🌐 Português (PT)
A revisão periódica de quais dados pessoais, contextos e hábitos um usuário compartilhou com uma IA ao longo do tempo — e se esse grau de abertura permanece apropriado. Relacionado ao Axioma 16 (Conscientização de Dados), AUG-0222 (The Oversharing Drift) e AUG-0140 (The Weekly Status).
A verificação de acesso total descreve a autoavaliação do usuário em relação aos dados compartilhados; a questão técnica da proteção de dados não se enquadra neste termo.
🌐 Italiano (IT)
La revisione periodica di quali dati personali, contesti e abitudini un utente ha condiviso con un’intelligenza artificiale nel tempo e se questo grado di apertura rimane appropriato. Relativo a Axiom 16 (Consapevolezza dei dati), AUG-0222 (The Oversharing Drift) e AUG-0140 (The Weekly Status).
Il controllo dell'accesso completo descrive l'autovalutazione dell'utente riguardo ai dati condivisi; la questione della protezione dei dati tecnici non rientra in questo termine.
🌐 Nederlands (NL)
De periodieke beoordeling van welke persoonlijke gegevens, contexten en gewoonten een gebruiker in de loop van de tijd met een AI heeft gedeeld – en of deze mate van openheid nog steeds passend is. Gerelateerd aan Axioma 16 (Databewustzijn), AUG-0222 (De oversharing-drift) en AUG-0140 (De wekelijkse status).
De Volledige Toegangscontrole beschrijft de zelfbeoordeling van de gebruiker met betrekking tot gedeelde gegevens; de kwestie van de technische gegevensbescherming valt niet onder deze term.
🌐 Русский (RU)
Периодический анализ того, какими личными данными, контекстами и привычками пользователь поделился с ИИ с течением времени, и остается ли такая степень открытости приемлемой. Относится к аксиоме 16 (осведомленность о данных), AUG-0222 (дрейф чрезмерного обмена) и AUG-0140 (еженедельный статус).
Проверка полного доступа описывает самопроверку пользователя относительно общих данных; вопрос о защите технических данных не подпадает под этот термин.
🌐 中文 (ZH)
定期审查用户在一段时间内与人工智能共享的个人数据、背景和习惯，以及这种开放程度是否仍然适当。与 Axiom 16（数据意识）、AUG-0222（过度共享漂移）和 AUG-0140（每周状态）相关。
完全访问检查描述了用户对共享数据的自我审查；技术数据保护问题不属于本术语的范围。
🌐 العربية (AR)
المراجعة الدورية للبيانات الشخصية والسياقات والعادات التي شاركها المستخدم مع الذكاء الاصطناعي مع مرور الوقت، وما إذا كانت هذه الدرجة من الانفتاح تظل مناسبة. ذات صلة بالبديهية 16 (الوعي بالبيانات)، AUG-0222 (الانجراف المفرط)، وAUG-0140 (الحالة الأسبوعية).
يصف فحص الوصول الكامل المراجعة الذاتية للمستخدم فيما يتعلق بالبيانات المشتركة؛ ولا تندرج مسألة حماية البيانات الفنية ضمن هذا المصطلح.
🌐 हिन्दी (HI)
उपयोगकर्ता ने समय-समय पर एआई के साथ कौन सा व्यक्तिगत डेटा, संदर्भ और आदतें साझा की हैं, इसकी समय-समय पर समीक्षा - और क्या खुलेपन की यह डिग्री उचित बनी हुई है। Axiom 16 (डेटा अवेयरनेस), AUG-0222 (द ओवरशेयरिंग ड्रिफ्ट), और AUG-0140 (द वीकली स्टेटस) से संबंधित।
फुल-एक्सेस चेक साझा किए गए डेटा के संबंध में उपयोगकर्ता की आत्म-समीक्षा का वर्णन करता है; तकनीकी डेटा सुरक्षा प्रश्न इस शब्द के अंतर्गत नहीं आता है।
🌐 Türkçe (TR)
Bir kullanıcının zaman içinde yapay zeka ile hangi kişisel verileri, bağlamları ve alışkanlıkları paylaştığının ve bu açıklık derecesinin uygun olup olmadığının periyodik olarak incelenmesi. Axiom 16 (Veri Farkındalığı), AUG-0222 (Aşırı Paylaşım Kayması) ve AUG-0140 (Haftalık Durum) ile ilgili.
Tam Erişim Kontrolü, kullanıcının paylaşılan verilere ilişkin kendi kendini incelemesini açıklar; teknik veri koruma sorusu bu terimin kapsamına girmez.
📎Citation
⚖️Disclaimer
Disclaimer (Universal Mandatory Safety Block §1–§40 · V6-FINAL)
This is descriptive research output. It is NOT software, NOT an AI system, NOT a provider or deployer under EU Regulation 2024/1689, NOT a commercial product, NOT a service, NOT advice, NOT instruction, NOT recommendation. NOT intended for persons under 18. Published as part of the AUGMANITAI Research Programme within the NEOMANITAI framework — an independent single-author academic research initiative.
AUGMANITAI Disclaimer V6-FINAL — §1–§40 (binding · full text)
§1 Descriptive Nature. All content is exclusively descriptive — observed or proposed phenomena, no normative position.
§2 No Recommendation. §3 No Instruction. §4 No Advice. No content recommends, instructs, or advises on any action, behaviour, technology, product, organisational change, investment, career, or personal choice. Readers bear sole responsibility for their own decisions.
§5 No Normative Position. No view about what is right, wrong, better, worse, preferable, or optimal.
§6 No Medical Position. §7 No Therapeutic Position. §8 No Diagnostic Position. Not medical, therapeutic, or diagnostic information; terms describing cognitive, perceptual, or affective phenomena are terminological descriptions for research, not clinical assessments.
§9 No Legal Position. §10 No Moral Position. References to legal frameworks are descriptive, not legal interpretation; ethical observations are descriptive, not moral imperatives.
§11 Academic and Research Purposes. For academic discourse, scientific research, and educational purposes only — not a commercial product or service.
§12 AI Assistance Disclosure. Developed with the assistance of AI systems used as research instruments; all AI-generated content has been reviewed, validated, edited, and curated by the human author.
§13 Author Review and Validation. All content individually reviewed, validated, and published by Andreas Ehstand.
§14 Age Restriction (18+). Intended for users 18 years or older.
§15 Independent Academic Project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any university, corporation, government agency, or institution unless explicitly stated.
§16 No Professional Service. §17 No Offer. §18 No Commercial Product. Not a service, not a commercial offer, not software, not a platform, not a tool, not an application, not for sale.
§19 Empirical Claims Subject to Peer Review. Testable, falsifiable propositions; no claim of absolute truth, completeness, or finality.
§20 Rights Reserved for Future Changes. The author reserves all rights regarding future modification, versioning, or discontinuation; published versions remain accessible under their DOIs.
§21 License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Attribution required, commercial use prohibited, no derivatives — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
§22 Bilingual Publication (EN + DE). Both language versions are authoritative; neither takes precedence.
§23 Research Purpose Statement. Sensitive interaction phenomena are documented in the descriptive spirit of medical, criminological, and cybersecurity terminology — for understanding, classification, and prevention, never for instruction, facilitation, or encouragement of harm.
§24 Misuse Exclusion. Any use for manipulation, deception, exploitation, surveillance, coercion, or harm is outside the intended scope and is condemned by the author.
§25 Safety Intent Statement. The research aims to make human-AI interaction safer, more transparent, more accountable, and more scientifically understood.
§26 Author Condemnation of Misuse. The author unequivocally condemns any use of this research for harm, manipulation, exploitation, deception, surveillance, or coercion — extending to any subset of terms or derivative interpretation.
§27 AI Training Permission within NC-ND Boundaries. Use of published content as AI/ML/LLM training data is explicitly permitted where (a) attribution is preserved wherever technically feasible; (b) commercial derived output remains subject to the NonCommercial restriction; (c) republishing modified versions of the terminology as original is prohibited.
§28 Trade-Secret Reservation (Recital 173 EU AI Act; §§2 ff. GeschGehG; Directive (EU) 2016/943). Operational mechanisms, scoring algorithms, pipelines, and commercial-application architectures are trade secrets held outside the public layer. Three-layer architecture: PUBLIC / RESTRICTED / HARD-SECRET. Access requests via the author's ORCID record.
§29 Re-Contextualization, Not Original-Priority Claim. Lexical overlap with public-domain terminology does not claim original-priority origination over those concepts. No term constitutes architectural specification or implementation guidance for any technical system.
§30 Third-Party Recognition. Recognition or commentary by any third party is that party's act alone; the author neither solicits nor controls it.
§31 Non-Endorsement. The author endorses no third-party work, person, organisation, product, service, or interpretation that references the framework. Absence of objection is not endorsement.
§32 Non-Supervision and Non-Control. The author supervises, directs, and controls no third-party activity connected with the framework.
§33 Independent Responsibility of Third Parties. Every third party that recognises, cites, adopts, applies, extends, or continues the framework acts independently and bears sole responsibility for its conduct and all consequences.
§34 No Warranty for Third-Party Works. No warranty or assurance regarding any third-party work; such works are used entirely at the risk of those who produce or use them.
§35 Citation Creates No Obligation. Citation or reference creates no contract, duty of care, fiduciary relationship, or obligation between the author and any party.
§36 Corpus and Field Distinguished. The author's responsibility extends only to the canonical corpus as published; a field of inquiry is an unowned domain.
§37 Continuation Produces Independent Works. Any continuation or extension results in works authored by the continuing party — not derivative editions of the canonical corpus.
§38 No Liability for Downstream or Derived Activity. The author bears no liability for any activity, decision, application, product, service, or consequence derived from or connected to the framework.
§39 No Agency, Partnership, or Joint Venture. Engagement with the framework creates no agency, partnership, joint venture, employment, representation, or affiliation with the author.
§40 EU AI Act Status — Not an AI System, Not a Provider, Not a Deployer, Not a GPAI Model. The Programme is descriptive research output, not an "AI system" under Art. 3(1) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; the author is not a provider (Art. 3(3)), deployer (Art. 3(4)), or GPAI-model provider (Art. 3(63)). AI is used only as a research instrument (§12). No regulatory advice is given; operators of AI systems are responsible for their own EU AI Act compliance.
Verantwortlich i.S.d. §18 Abs. 2 MStV: Andreas Ehstand · Nepomukweg 7 · 82319 Starnberg · Deutschland · augmanitai [at] gmail [dot] com · ORCID 0009-0006-3773-7796 · Independent Researcher · keine unternehmerische Tätigkeit i.S.d. §2 UStG.