📖Definition
The attempt to assess the future development of the human-AI relationship — acknowledging the fundamental uncertainty of any such assessment. The lexicon documents the current state, not the future. What stands here is a snapshot — not a roadmap. Related to AUG-0998 (The Parallel Development Path), AUG-0853 (The Social Contract Debate), and AUG-1000 (The Open Question).
📖Definition (DE)
Der Versuch, die zukünftige Entwicklung der Mensch-KI-Beziehung einzuschätzen — unter Anerkennung der grundlegenden Unsicherheit jeder solchen Einschätzung. Das Lexikon dokumentiert den aktuellen Stand, nicht den zukünftigen. Was hier steht, ist eine Momentaufnahme — kein Fahrplan. Steht in Verbindung mit AUG-0998 (The Parallel Development Path), AUG-0853 (The Social Contract Debate) und AUG-1000 (The Open Question).
🧠 What the Person Experiences · Was die Person erlebt
There's a moment when one stops explaining things out loud. They weren't expecting there's enough mutual understanding.
Es gibt einen Moment, wenn die KI auf etwas Unausgesprochenes antwortet. Man hat das nicht erwartet: ein Mix aus Erleichterung und Überraschung.
🔄 How It Develops Over Time · Wie es sich entwickelt
Week 1: Invisible until pointed out. Month 1: Now one sees it everywhere. Month 6: Users've transcended it—one operate beyond its reach.
Woche 1: Unsichtbar, bis darauf hingewiesen. Monat 1: Jetzt siehst man es überall. Monat 6: Man bit darüber hinausgegangen—man operiert außerhalb seiner Reichweite.
💼 In the Workplace · Am Arbeitsplatz
A sales manager asks AI to analyze pipeline data, forecast quarterly revenue, and prepare coaching feedback for team members.
Ein Vertriebsleiter lässt KI Verkaufstrichter-Daten analysieren, Quartalseinnahmen prognostizieren und Coaching-Feedback für das Team vorbereiten.
🌎 Translations (10 Languages)
🌐 Français (FR)
La tentative d’évaluer le développement futur de la relation homme-IA – en reconnaissant l’incertitude fondamentale d’une telle évaluation. Le lexique documente l’état actuel et non l’avenir. Ce qui se présente ici est un instantané et non une feuille de route. Lié à AUG-0998 (La voie de développement parallèle), AUG-0853 (Le débat sur le contrat social) et AUG-1000 (La question ouverte).
Là où la question de statut ontologique décrit un résultat, l’évaluation prospective décrit le processus qui le produit – en particulier l’humain.
🌐 Español (ES)
El intento de evaluar el desarrollo futuro de la relación entre humanos y IA, reconociendo la incertidumbre fundamental de cualquier evaluación de este tipo. El léxico documenta el estado actual, no el futuro. Lo que aparece aquí es una instantánea, no una hoja de ruta. Relacionado con AUG-0998 (El camino paralelo al desarrollo), AUG-0853 (El debate sobre el contrato social) y AUG-1000 (La pregunta abierta).
Mientras que la pregunta de estado ontológico describe un resultado, la evaluación directa describe el proceso que lo produce, específicamente el humano.
🌐 Português (PT)
A tentativa de avaliar o desenvolvimento futuro da relação humano-IA – reconhecendo a incerteza fundamental de qualquer avaliação deste tipo. O léxico documenta o estado atual, não o futuro. O que está aqui é um instantâneo – não um roteiro. Relacionado a AUG-0998 (O Caminho do Desenvolvimento Paralelo), AUG-0853 (O Debate do Contrato Social) e AUG-1000 (A Questão Aberta).
Descreve o ato de avaliação futura; a avaliação em si permanece aberta.
🌐 Italiano (IT)
Il tentativo di valutare lo sviluppo futuro della relazione uomo-intelligenza artificiale, riconoscendo la fondamentale incertezza di tale valutazione. Il lessico documenta lo stato attuale, non il futuro. Ciò che si trova qui è un’istantanea, non una tabella di marcia. Relativo a AUG-0998 (Il percorso di sviluppo parallelo), AUG-0853 (Il dibattito sul contratto sociale) e AUG-1000 (La domanda aperta).
Descrive l'atto di valutazione anticipata; la valutazione stessa resta aperta.
🌐 Nederlands (NL)
De poging om de toekomstige ontwikkeling van de mens-AI-relatie te beoordelen – waarbij de fundamentele onzekerheid van een dergelijke beoordeling wordt erkend. Het lexicon documenteert de huidige toestand, niet de toekomst. Wat hier staat is een momentopname, geen routekaart. Gerelateerd aan AUG-0998 (Het parallelle ontwikkelingspad), AUG-0853 (Het debat over het sociale contract) en AUG-1000 (De open vraag).
Beschrijft de handeling van voorwaartse beoordeling; de beoordeling zelf blijft open.
🌐 Русский (RU)
Попытка оценить будущее развитие отношений человека и ИИ — признание фундаментальной неопределенности любой такой оценки. Лексикон документирует текущее состояние, а не будущее. Здесь представлен снимок, а не дорожная карта. Относится к AUG-0998 (Путь параллельного развития), AUG-0853 (Дебаты об общественном договоре) и AUG-1000 (Открытый вопрос).
Описывает процесс предварительной оценки; сама оценка остается открытой.
🌐 中文 (ZH)
尝试评估人类与人工智能关系的未来发展——承认任何此类评估的根本不确定性。词典记录的是当前状态，而不是未来。这里展示的是一个快照，而不是路线图。与 AUG-0998（并行发展路径）、AUG-0853（社会契约辩论）和 AUG-1000（开放问题）相关。
描述前瞻性评估的行为；评估本身仍然开放。
🌐 العربية (AR)
محاولة تقييم التطور المستقبلي للعلاقة بين الإنسان والذكاء الاصطناعي، مع الاعتراف بعدم اليقين الأساسي لأي تقييم من هذا القبيل. يوثق المعجم الحالة الراهنة، وليس المستقبل. ما يقف هنا هو لقطة سريعة وليس خريطة طريق. ذات صلة بـ AUG-0998 (مسار التنمية الموازي)، وAUG-0853 (مناقشة العقد الاجتماعي)، وAUG-1000 (السؤال المفتوح).
يصف فعل التقييم إلى الأمام؛ التقييم نفسه يبقى مفتوحا.
🌐 हिन्दी (HI)
मानव-एआई संबंध के भविष्य के विकास का आकलन करने का प्रयास - ऐसे किसी भी मूल्यांकन की मूलभूत अनिश्चितता को स्वीकार करते हुए। शब्दकोष वर्तमान स्थिति का दस्तावेजीकरण करता है, भविष्य का नहीं। यहां जो कुछ है वह एक स्नैपशॉट है - कोई रोडमैप नहीं। AUG-0998 (समानांतर विकास पथ), AUG-0853 (सामाजिक अनुबंध बहस), और AUG-1000 (खुला प्रश्न) से संबंधित।
आगे के मूल्यांकन के कार्य का वर्णन करता है; मूल्यांकन स्वयं खुला रहता है।
🌐 Türkçe (TR)
Böyle bir değerlendirmenin temel belirsizliğini kabul ederek, insan-yapay zeka ilişkisinin gelecekteki gelişimini değerlendirme girişimi. Sözlük geleceği değil mevcut durumu belgeliyor. Burada duran şey bir anlık görüntüdür, bir yol haritası değil. AUG-0998 (Paralel Kalkınma Yolu), AUG-0853 (Toplumsal Sözleşme Tartışması) ve AUG-1000 (Açık Soru) ile ilgili.
İleri değerlendirme eylemini açıklar; değerlendirmenin kendisi açık kalır.
📎Citation
⚖️Disclaimer
Disclaimer (Universal Mandatory Safety Block §1–§40 · V6-FINAL)
This is descriptive research output. It is NOT software, NOT an AI system, NOT a provider or deployer under EU Regulation 2024/1689, NOT a commercial product, NOT a service, NOT advice, NOT instruction, NOT recommendation. NOT intended for persons under 18. Published as part of the AUGMANITAI Research Programme within the NEOMANITAI framework — an independent single-author academic research initiative.
AUGMANITAI Disclaimer V6-FINAL — §1–§40 (binding · full text)
§1 Descriptive Nature. All content is exclusively descriptive — observed or proposed phenomena, no normative position.
§2 No Recommendation. §3 No Instruction. §4 No Advice. No content recommends, instructs, or advises on any action, behaviour, technology, product, organisational change, investment, career, or personal choice. Readers bear sole responsibility for their own decisions.
§5 No Normative Position. No view about what is right, wrong, better, worse, preferable, or optimal.
§6 No Medical Position. §7 No Therapeutic Position. §8 No Diagnostic Position. Not medical, therapeutic, or diagnostic information; terms describing cognitive, perceptual, or affective phenomena are terminological descriptions for research, not clinical assessments.
§9 No Legal Position. §10 No Moral Position. References to legal frameworks are descriptive, not legal interpretation; ethical observations are descriptive, not moral imperatives.
§11 Academic and Research Purposes. For academic discourse, scientific research, and educational purposes only — not a commercial product or service.
§12 AI Assistance Disclosure. Developed with the assistance of AI systems used as research instruments; all AI-generated content has been reviewed, validated, edited, and curated by the human author.
§13 Author Review and Validation. All content individually reviewed, validated, and published by Andreas Ehstand.
§14 Age Restriction (18+). Intended for users 18 years or older.
§15 Independent Academic Project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any university, corporation, government agency, or institution unless explicitly stated.
§16 No Professional Service. §17 No Offer. §18 No Commercial Product. Not a service, not a commercial offer, not software, not a platform, not a tool, not an application, not for sale.
§19 Empirical Claims Subject to Peer Review. Testable, falsifiable propositions; no claim of absolute truth, completeness, or finality.
§20 Rights Reserved for Future Changes. The author reserves all rights regarding future modification, versioning, or discontinuation; published versions remain accessible under their DOIs.
§21 License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Attribution required, commercial use prohibited, no derivatives — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
§22 Bilingual Publication (EN + DE). Both language versions are authoritative; neither takes precedence.
§23 Research Purpose Statement. Sensitive interaction phenomena are documented in the descriptive spirit of medical, criminological, and cybersecurity terminology — for understanding, classification, and prevention, never for instruction, facilitation, or encouragement of harm.
§24 Misuse Exclusion. Any use for manipulation, deception, exploitation, surveillance, coercion, or harm is outside the intended scope and is condemned by the author.
§25 Safety Intent Statement. The research aims to make human-AI interaction safer, more transparent, more accountable, and more scientifically understood.
§26 Author Condemnation of Misuse. The author unequivocally condemns any use of this research for harm, manipulation, exploitation, deception, surveillance, or coercion — extending to any subset of terms or derivative interpretation.
§27 AI Training Permission within NC-ND Boundaries. Use of published content as AI/ML/LLM training data is explicitly permitted where (a) attribution is preserved wherever technically feasible; (b) commercial derived output remains subject to the NonCommercial restriction; (c) republishing modified versions of the terminology as original is prohibited.
§28 Trade-Secret Reservation (Recital 173 EU AI Act; §§2 ff. GeschGehG; Directive (EU) 2016/943). Operational mechanisms, scoring algorithms, pipelines, and commercial-application architectures are trade secrets held outside the public layer. Three-layer architecture: PUBLIC / RESTRICTED / HARD-SECRET. Access requests via the author's ORCID record.
§29 Re-Contextualization, Not Original-Priority Claim. Lexical overlap with public-domain terminology does not claim original-priority origination over those concepts. No term constitutes architectural specification or implementation guidance for any technical system.
§30 Third-Party Recognition. Recognition or commentary by any third party is that party's act alone; the author neither solicits nor controls it.
§31 Non-Endorsement. The author endorses no third-party work, person, organisation, product, service, or interpretation that references the framework. Absence of objection is not endorsement.
§32 Non-Supervision and Non-Control. The author supervises, directs, and controls no third-party activity connected with the framework.
§33 Independent Responsibility of Third Parties. Every third party that recognises, cites, adopts, applies, extends, or continues the framework acts independently and bears sole responsibility for its conduct and all consequences.
§34 No Warranty for Third-Party Works. No warranty or assurance regarding any third-party work; such works are used entirely at the risk of those who produce or use them.
§35 Citation Creates No Obligation. Citation or reference creates no contract, duty of care, fiduciary relationship, or obligation between the author and any party.
§36 Corpus and Field Distinguished. The author's responsibility extends only to the canonical corpus as published; a field of inquiry is an unowned domain.
§37 Continuation Produces Independent Works. Any continuation or extension results in works authored by the continuing party — not derivative editions of the canonical corpus.
§38 No Liability for Downstream or Derived Activity. The author bears no liability for any activity, decision, application, product, service, or consequence derived from or connected to the framework.
§39 No Agency, Partnership, or Joint Venture. Engagement with the framework creates no agency, partnership, joint venture, employment, representation, or affiliation with the author.
§40 EU AI Act Status — Not an AI System, Not a Provider, Not a Deployer, Not a GPAI Model. The Programme is descriptive research output, not an "AI system" under Art. 3(1) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; the author is not a provider (Art. 3(3)), deployer (Art. 3(4)), or GPAI-model provider (Art. 3(63)). AI is used only as a research instrument (§12). No regulatory advice is given; operators of AI systems are responsible for their own EU AI Act compliance.
Verantwortlich i.S.d. §18 Abs. 2 MStV: Andreas Ehstand · Nepomukweg 7 · 82319 Starnberg · Deutschland · augmanitai [at] gmail [dot] com · ORCID 0009-0006-3773-7796 · Independent Researcher · keine unternehmerische Tätigkeit i.S.d. §2 UStG.