📖Definition
The tendency to attribute more authority to the AI than justified — especially in domains where the user is uncertain and the AI suggests competence through confident formulation. Related to AUG-0208 (The Authority Question), AUG-0422 (The Unchecked Trust), and AUG-0375 (The Simulation Awareness).
📖Definition (DE)
Die Tendenz, der KI mehr Autorität zuzuschreiben als gerechtfertigt — besonders in Fachbereichen, in denen der Nutzer selbst unsicher ist und die KI durch sichere Formulierung Kompetenz suggeriert. Steht in Verbindung mit AUG-0208 (The Authority Question), AUG-0422 (The Unchecked Trust) und AUG-0375 (The Simulation Awareness).
🧠 What the Person Experiences · Was die Person erlebt
I experience a shift—something clicks into clarity. There's a moment of recognition where abstract becomes concrete, and suddenly the pattern I was sensing becomes visible. It feels like learning something about myself.
Ich erlebe einen Wandel—etwas springt in Klarheit. Es gibt einen Moment der Erkennung, in dem Abstraktes konkret wird, und plötzlich wird das Muster, das ich spürte, sichtbar. Es fühlt sich an wie das Erlernen von etwas über mich selbst.
🔄 How It Develops Over Time · Wie es sich entwickelt
Week1: Initial awareness of the concept. Month1: Deliberate practice and exploration across contexts. Month6: Integration becomes intuitive and automatic, functioning as second nature.
Woche1: Anfängliches Bewusstsein des Konzepts. Monat1: Bewusste Praxis über verschiedene Kontexte. Monat6: Integration wird intuitiv und automatisch, funktioniert als zweite Natur.
💼 In the Workplace · Am Arbeitsplatz
A marketing manager using AI to analyze campaign data and identify emerging customer trends before quarterly reviews.
Ein Marketing-Manager nutzt KI, um Kampagnendaten zu analysieren und neue Kundentrends vor vierteljährlichen Reviews zu identifizieren.
🌎 Translations (10 Languages)
🌐 Français (FR)
La tendance à attribuer plus d’autorité à l’IA que ce qui est justifié – en particulier dans les domaines où l’utilisateur est incertain et où l’IA suggère une compétence par une formulation confiante. Lié à AUG-0208 (La question d'autorité), AUG-0422 (La confiance non contrôlée) et AUG-0375 (La sensibilisation à la simulation).
L'Autorité Lean décrit l'attribution d'autorité gonflée ; une confiance consciemment calibrée est décrite par AUG-0177 (The Trust Setting).
🌐 Español (ES)
La tendencia a atribuir a la IA más autoridad de la justificada, especialmente en dominios donde el usuario no está seguro y la IA sugiere competencia a través de una formulación segura. Relacionado con AUG-0208 (La pregunta de autoridad), AUG-0422 (La confianza no controlada) y AUG-0375 (La conciencia de simulación).
Authority Lean describe la atribución de autoridad inflada; La confianza conscientemente calibrada se describe en AUG-0177 (El entorno de confianza).
🌐 Português (PT)
atribuir mais autoridade à IA do que o justificado — especialmente em domínios onde o utilizador está inseguro e a IA sugere competência através de uma formulação confiante. Relacionado a AUG-0208 (A Questão da Autoridade), AUG-0422 (A Confiança Não Verificada) e AUG-0375 (A Consciência da Simulação).
O Authority Lean descreve a atribuição de autoridade inflada; a confiança conscientemente calibrada é descrita por AUG-0177 (The Trust Setting).
🌐 Italiano (IT)
attribuire all'IA più autorità di quanto sia giustificato, specialmente nei settori in cui l'utente è incerto e l'IA suggerisce la competenza attraverso una formulazione sicura. Relativo a AUG-0208 (La questione dell'autorità), AUG-0422 (La fiducia incontrollata) e AUG-0375 (La consapevolezza della simulazione).
L'Authority Lean descrive l'attribuzione di autorità gonfiata; la fiducia calibrata consapevolmente è descritta da AUG-0177 (The Trust Setting).
🌐 Nederlands (NL)
meer autoriteit aan de AI toekennen dan gerechtvaardigd is – vooral in domeinen waar de gebruiker onzeker is en de AI competentie suggereert door middel van zelfverzekerde formulering. Gerelateerd aan AUG-0208 (De autoriteitsvraag), AUG-0422 (Het ongecontroleerde vertrouwen) en AUG-0375 (Het simulatiebewustzijn).
De Authority Lean beschrijft de opgeblazen autoriteitstoekenning; bewust gekalibreerd vertrouwen wordt beschreven door AUG-0177 (De vertrouwensinstelling).
🌐 Русский (RU)
придавать ИИ больше полномочий, чем это оправдано, особенно в областях, где пользователь не уверен, а ИИ предполагает компетентность посредством уверенных формулировок. Относится к AUG-0208 (Авторитетный вопрос), AUG-0422 (Непроверяемое доверие) и AUG-0375 (Осведомленность о симуляции).
Авторитетное бережливое отношение описывает завышенное приписывание полномочий; сознательно калиброванное доверие описывается AUG-0177 (Настройка доверия).
🌐 中文 (ZH)
赋予人工智能更多的权威而不是合理的——尤其是在用户不确定并且人工智能通过自信的表述表明其能力的领域。与 AUG-0208（权威问题）、AUG-0422（未经检查的信任）和 AUG-0375（模拟意识）相关。
权威精益描述了夸大的权威归因； AUG-0177（信任设置）描述了有意识地校准的信任。
🌐 العربية (AR)
إسناد سلطة أكبر للذكاء الاصطناعي أكثر من المبررة - خاصة في المجالات التي يكون فيها المستخدم غير متأكد ويقترح الذكاء الاصطناعي الكفاءة من خلال صياغة واثقة. ذات صلة بـ AUG-0208 (سؤال السلطة)، وAUG-0422 (الثقة غير المحددة)، وAUG-0375 (الوعي بالمحاكاة).
يصف "هزيل السلطة" إسناد السلطة المتضخم؛ يتم وصف الثقة التي تمت معايرتها بوعي بواسطة AUG-0177 (إعداد الثقة).
🌐 हिन्दी (HI)
एआई को उचित से अधिक अधिकार देना - विशेष रूप से उन डोमेन में जहां उपयोगकर्ता अनिश्चित है और एआई आत्मविश्वासपूर्ण फॉर्मूलेशन के माध्यम से क्षमता का सुझाव देता है। AUG-0208 (प्राधिकरण प्रश्न), AUG-0422 (अनचेक्ड ट्रस्ट), और AUG-0375 (सिमुलेशन अवेयरनेस) से संबंधित।
अथॉरिटी लीन बढ़े हुए अथॉरिटी एट्रिब्यूशन का वर्णन करता है; सचेत रूप से कैलिब्रेटेड ट्रस्ट का वर्णन AUG-0177 (ट्रस्ट सेटिंग) द्वारा किया गया है।
🌐 Türkçe (TR)
Özellikle kullanıcının belirsiz olduğu ve yapay zekanın kendinden emin formülasyon yoluyla yeterlilik önerdiği alanlarda, yapay zekaya haklı olduğundan daha fazla otorite atfetmek. AUG-0208 (Otorite Sorusu), AUG-0422 (Denetlenmeyen Güven) ve AUG-0375 (Simülasyon Farkındalığı) ile ilgili.
Yalın Otorite, şişirilmiş otorite atıfını açıklar; bilinçli olarak kalibre edilmiş güven, AUG-0177 (Güven Ayarı) tarafından açıklanmaktadır.
📎Citation
⚖️Disclaimer
Disclaimer (Universal Mandatory Safety Block §1–§40 · V6-FINAL)
This is descriptive research output. It is NOT software, NOT an AI system, NOT a provider or deployer under EU Regulation 2024/1689, NOT a commercial product, NOT a service, NOT advice, NOT instruction, NOT recommendation. NOT intended for persons under 18. Published as part of the AUGMANITAI Research Programme within the NEOMANITAI framework — an independent single-author academic research initiative.
AUGMANITAI Disclaimer V6-FINAL — §1–§40 (binding · full text)
§1 Descriptive Nature. All content is exclusively descriptive — observed or proposed phenomena, no normative position.
§2 No Recommendation. §3 No Instruction. §4 No Advice. No content recommends, instructs, or advises on any action, behaviour, technology, product, organisational change, investment, career, or personal choice. Readers bear sole responsibility for their own decisions.
§5 No Normative Position. No view about what is right, wrong, better, worse, preferable, or optimal.
§6 No Medical Position. §7 No Therapeutic Position. §8 No Diagnostic Position. Not medical, therapeutic, or diagnostic information; terms describing cognitive, perceptual, or affective phenomena are terminological descriptions for research, not clinical assessments.
§9 No Legal Position. §10 No Moral Position. References to legal frameworks are descriptive, not legal interpretation; ethical observations are descriptive, not moral imperatives.
§11 Academic and Research Purposes. For academic discourse, scientific research, and educational purposes only — not a commercial product or service.
§12 AI Assistance Disclosure. Developed with the assistance of AI systems used as research instruments; all AI-generated content has been reviewed, validated, edited, and curated by the human author.
§13 Author Review and Validation. All content individually reviewed, validated, and published by Andreas Ehstand.
§14 Age Restriction (18+). Intended for users 18 years or older.
§15 Independent Academic Project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any university, corporation, government agency, or institution unless explicitly stated.
§16 No Professional Service. §17 No Offer. §18 No Commercial Product. Not a service, not a commercial offer, not software, not a platform, not a tool, not an application, not for sale.
§19 Empirical Claims Subject to Peer Review. Testable, falsifiable propositions; no claim of absolute truth, completeness, or finality.
§20 Rights Reserved for Future Changes. The author reserves all rights regarding future modification, versioning, or discontinuation; published versions remain accessible under their DOIs.
§21 License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Attribution required, commercial use prohibited, no derivatives — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
§22 Bilingual Publication (EN + DE). Both language versions are authoritative; neither takes precedence.
§23 Research Purpose Statement. Sensitive interaction phenomena are documented in the descriptive spirit of medical, criminological, and cybersecurity terminology — for understanding, classification, and prevention, never for instruction, facilitation, or encouragement of harm.
§24 Misuse Exclusion. Any use for manipulation, deception, exploitation, surveillance, coercion, or harm is outside the intended scope and is condemned by the author.
§25 Safety Intent Statement. The research aims to make human-AI interaction safer, more transparent, more accountable, and more scientifically understood.
§26 Author Condemnation of Misuse. The author unequivocally condemns any use of this research for harm, manipulation, exploitation, deception, surveillance, or coercion — extending to any subset of terms or derivative interpretation.
§27 AI Training Permission within NC-ND Boundaries. Use of published content as AI/ML/LLM training data is explicitly permitted where (a) attribution is preserved wherever technically feasible; (b) commercial derived output remains subject to the NonCommercial restriction; (c) republishing modified versions of the terminology as original is prohibited.
§28 Trade-Secret Reservation (Recital 173 EU AI Act; §§2 ff. GeschGehG; Directive (EU) 2016/943). Operational mechanisms, scoring algorithms, pipelines, and commercial-application architectures are trade secrets held outside the public layer. Three-layer architecture: PUBLIC / RESTRICTED / HARD-SECRET. Access requests via the author's ORCID record.
§29 Re-Contextualization, Not Original-Priority Claim. Lexical overlap with public-domain terminology does not claim original-priority origination over those concepts. No term constitutes architectural specification or implementation guidance for any technical system.
§30 Third-Party Recognition. Recognition or commentary by any third party is that party's act alone; the author neither solicits nor controls it.
§31 Non-Endorsement. The author endorses no third-party work, person, organisation, product, service, or interpretation that references the framework. Absence of objection is not endorsement.
§32 Non-Supervision and Non-Control. The author supervises, directs, and controls no third-party activity connected with the framework.
§33 Independent Responsibility of Third Parties. Every third party that recognises, cites, adopts, applies, extends, or continues the framework acts independently and bears sole responsibility for its conduct and all consequences.
§34 No Warranty for Third-Party Works. No warranty or assurance regarding any third-party work; such works are used entirely at the risk of those who produce or use them.
§35 Citation Creates No Obligation. Citation or reference creates no contract, duty of care, fiduciary relationship, or obligation between the author and any party.
§36 Corpus and Field Distinguished. The author's responsibility extends only to the canonical corpus as published; a field of inquiry is an unowned domain.
§37 Continuation Produces Independent Works. Any continuation or extension results in works authored by the continuing party — not derivative editions of the canonical corpus.
§38 No Liability for Downstream or Derived Activity. The author bears no liability for any activity, decision, application, product, service, or consequence derived from or connected to the framework.
§39 No Agency, Partnership, or Joint Venture. Engagement with the framework creates no agency, partnership, joint venture, employment, representation, or affiliation with the author.
§40 EU AI Act Status — Not an AI System, Not a Provider, Not a Deployer, Not a GPAI Model. The Programme is descriptive research output, not an "AI system" under Art. 3(1) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; the author is not a provider (Art. 3(3)), deployer (Art. 3(4)), or GPAI-model provider (Art. 3(63)). AI is used only as a research instrument (§12). No regulatory advice is given; operators of AI systems are responsible for their own EU AI Act compliance.
Verantwortlich i.S.d. §18 Abs. 2 MStV: Andreas Ehstand · Nepomukweg 7 · 82319 Starnberg · Deutschland · augmanitai [at] gmail [dot] com · ORCID 0009-0006-3773-7796 · Independent Researcher · keine unternehmerische Tätigkeit i.S.d. §2 UStG.